You are not logged in. Would you like to login?
With the exception of "The Back Alley", CIVIL DISCUSSION IS EXPECTED
Offline
Speaking of fake (climate) news..
SESticle showed up again with a derisive, dishonest pile of Climate Denier stink.
***
In case you missed it because of all the TDS-induced anti-Trump hysteria on here...[First, the announcement of his absolute Trumpster loyalties]
Posted by CE0802 on May 21, 2026, 5:24 am
Remember me saying that the Global Warmi.[Over and over, the same fake distinction between cause and effect]..uh, Climate Change models - that were being used by the alarmist lunatics to predict things like southern Florida being under water by last year - were total bullsh*t? [That statement is total BS, yes]
Remember when ignorant tools on here claimed that my opinion didn't matter because I had no background in predictive modeling? [Your opinion doesn't matter because you're a Trumptard]
Remember how I said that I had been doing predictive modeling for over 30 years? [calling you on that lie]
Well, it comes as no surprise that I was right and the ignorant tools on here were wrong.[Hot baloney]
The IPCC now admits that their most dire models - the ones used by Global Warmi...uh, Climate Change alarmists to predict the most extreme impacts - were total bullsh*t.[Another lie]
No wonder no one is talking about Climate Change anymore.[It's occurring, just like Trump fascism. No need to go over and over it, twit]
Unfortunately, the damage has been done. An entire generation was psychologically damaged by being told that the world was ending.[No one but you said that, moron]
***
American Enterprise Institute is of course, a right-wing 'think' tank.
Offline
Additional note on Kenniboi:
As soon as Mongo Feces posted a smarmy, fake 'love pic' of Donnie and Melanoma, Ken put it at the top of the board.
We know whose side you're on, Ken. Shame on you. Or is Mongo running the board now?
No, that couldn't be. KR would already be banned.
Offline
Kenniboi is a increasingly a Trumper:
***
Is Gavin Newsom mostly dumb or is he mostly dishonest?
Posted by Ken C on May 24, 2026, 11:29 am
He could be both, but which is he more of? Is he mostly dumb?, or is he mostly dishonest?
Oil companies make about $0.20 per gallon profit from California gas.
California government gets about $0.71 per gallon profit from high gas taxes.
California's restrictive regulations also make gas even more expensive.
If Newsom was smart and honest, he could say something like "We need high gas taxes to save the environment and to fund our clean energy goals." Instead of that, he is blaming the oil companies for his bad gas policies.
***
Ken a Trumpster? Is this why he kisses Mongo's butt?
When you drive your little electric car, why do you care so much about gas?
And why should the states not charge gasoline taxes?
Unfit to host any board.
Last edited by greenman (5/26/2026 11:41 am)
Offline
Yeah, his pro-maga stance has been becoming more prevalent
Offline
Trish wrote:
Yeah, his pro-maga stance has been becoming more prevalent
Another good reason to leave that failed experiment behind, frankly.
Offline
Another racist Mongo post, although the article isn't a bad one..
***
Say "good-bye and good-riddance" to ape man ...
Posted by Mondo Fuego™ on May 27, 2026, 7:52 am
Mmmm, Buh-Bye
Democratic Rep. Al Green unseated by Rep. Christian Menefee in Texas primary with two incumbents...
***
'Ape Man' is overtly racist, Ken. You shouldn't let this moronic thug post filth like that.
Offline
Also gotta love how DFM has taken over Yellow and made it the 'Jew Board.' He has literally half (15/30) of the posts there, all of which are pro-Judaism and pro-Israel, or anti-Muslim and/or anti-Arab.
What a disgusting bigot and defender of hatred, war and violence. And then on White Whine and Lavender Politics it's the same thing, with a big dose of Trump support thrown in.
DFM the Deplorable!
ps - there are a couple that involve the meaning or history of Judaism which aren't bad.
Last edited by greenman (5/29/2026 10:20 am)
Offline
This is how stupid Otis Campbell is:
***
God Bless President Trump [Cult member]
Posted by Otis Campbell on May 31, 2026, 10:56 am
One of the greatest Presidents in our 250 years as a nation! All of our national debt has been created by Harvard and Yale grads! [Simply a lie, since Trump has created an enormous amount of the Debt and never attended either school]
Ain't they BRILLIANT? [Says the genius who voted for a traitorous criminal]
***
Literally one of the stupidest posts I've seen in my life, even on THAT board.
No understanding there of ANY facet of the world we live in.
Last edited by greenman (6/01/2026 8:17 am)
Offline
Lord Mongo is at his best when he's at his most intellectually pretentious. To wit:
***
That old Mondo, he never posts anything of substance.[Know thyself]>
Posted by Mondo Fuego™ on June 1, 2026, 5:23 am
On Atheism
by Mondo Fuego™
We have seen strong arguments for the existence of God ...[You and ...who else?]
Cosmological
Teleological
Moral
Ontological
[Do you know what 'Ontological' and 'Teleological' mean?)
Etc.
Beliefs, faith, mysticism, teachings, culture, tradition ... whatever to which one wishes to ascribe one's tenets [tortured English]. Yes, religion is hugely traditional. We [You] fbelieve because our ancestors believed. The religious world is full of churches, synagogues, temples, mosques ... lots of man hours and bricks and mortar devoted to the beliefs.
Yet, they are founded in the otherwise inexplicable phenomenon of creation ... everything we encounter is a creation ...[false] therefore someone or something must have created it ... right? Even the worn-out big bang theory [what theory has superseded it, please?] presupposes some kind of creative force. [Or at least you describe it as such] New astrophysical thinking is that the universe has always existed. God is thought to have always existed. [by WHOM?] One is the creator, the other is the created. Perhaps they are one and the same. Yay, one for Baruch! [Gibberish with no scientific meaning]
What is lacking in atheism is any logical inductive or deductive reasoning that leads to its conclusion. ['I do not believe God exists.' Refute me.]
I would like to see the line of reasoning that gets one to the point of atheism. Where is one's thinking before, and then when it starts? What triggers it? ['I don't see any evidence of a God. Refute me.] I don't buy the "leap of faith" argument ... there's no faith in atheism upon which to leap. [Only if you say 'I believe God does not exist.' That would involve faith.]"Leaping" also implies the point from which the leaping is done ... where is that point? Is it disillusionment? Is it anger at God for something they think He caused? [Who is 'angry' at something in which they do not believe?] That's emotional baggage, not rational thought. [More gibberish] An "Aha" moment? What was the "Aha"? ['Aha! Mongo is a pretentious imbecile!]
Atheism is to be likened to a perfect vacuum ... nothing there ... nothing to support it. [Nothing to refute it so far] It is also perhaps an illusion. One thinks that they do not believe, but they can never be quite sure because they can't put their finger on what or why they don't believe.[God.] The rational basis for total disbelief just ain't there. In some cases, atheism could just be a trendy rebellious movement, kind-a like anti-American sentiment among certain "progressive" cults, perhaps even ephemeral, subject to reversal when the next stimulus or trend is encountered.[I had a feeling it would come to your cultish, fake-Christian politics sooner or later, Trumpster]
Believers realize that they can't be quite sure, but they don't worry about it because the ultimate paydirt is to be made manifest at some point in the future, and they have the assurance of the now, and that the sun will rise tomorrow.[You have the assurance of simple-minded cultic belief. Congratulations, Sir Simpleton!]
I respectfully rest my case.
Counterpoints invited.
***
First, what 'case?'
Second, what am I arguing against?
Third, why the Trumpist politics?
You are a clown. There are uneducated people in the State Pen who argue better.
Last edited by greenman (6/01/2026 1:24 pm)
Offline
Of course he also hates women, just like his Orange Lord and Master..
***
NBC woman Kristen Welker is quite a barracuda ... she eats nails for breakfast.[She made your boy run away..lol]
Posted by Mondo Fuego™ on June 9, 2026, 9:52 am
She was already filled with hate before she started this interview with Trump.[Where did she indicate 'hate?']
How would like to wake up with this beast every morning? Arrrrrggggghhhhhh![No one wants to wake up with you either, creep]
Farce the Nation with Piranha Kristen Welker
***
Childish..spiteful..pro-Trump...dishonest...misogynist...wishes he could get laid ('Ju-Ju? Where are you?')
What a pig.
Last edited by greenman (6/09/2026 3:12 pm)
Offline
Is mongo's board dead now?
First time looking in for several weeks and it is a ghost town but for basically DFM talking to himself with zero new posts for several days now.
Offline
"We have seen strong arguments for the existence of God..."
I'll take "Things That Never Happened" for $400, Alex! There are in fact strong arguments for considering belief in God to be valid (o hai there, Soren Kierkegaard!), but no argument trying to prove that existence has ever even come close.
Offline
Belief being the keyword. I take extra care to separate what I believe from what I know (can prove) substantively. And, if my beliefs are proven wrong in the future I am open to that awareness and change. I don't see why so many people of faith feel the HAVE TO BE RIGHT
On a wholly different self-serving topic. I made it to round 2 of Favorite Chef. Those interested can vote once daily here. . I may make round three, round four gets iffy
Last edited by Trish (6/16/2026 5:27 pm)
Offline
It's awfully quiet in here LOL ...
Offline
I am so pissed off this morning. I saw the thread below and sent it to ken. He said it was free speech (but he didn't watch the whole video) seemed to ignore the wording of replies REALLY????? I get having limited time but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what's wrong here
Queer For Palestine BEGS To Go To Iran & Gets An INSTANT REALITY CHECK! - DFM August 16, 2026, 3:13 am
- KR August 17, 2026, 5:55 pm
- GOG August 17, 2026, 6:39 pm
- DFM August 16, 2026, 10:46 am
Offline
Yeah, that thread and his reaction is an excellent example of what I constantly ran into back when I used to help him out informally. He doesn't seem to get the nuances of posts. However, it appears that the thread in question violates the written rules,
particularly the "no racism/hatred" rule & likely the no politics rule too. No surprises there, DFM is a notorious hater of Muslims and LGBTQ+ peeps.
It's a no-brainer deletion that also requires a "not allowed there disclaimer" as well.
BTW, you do know that Boardhost is shutting down all non-paid forums fairly soon, right? I put out notice about being notified that we had only 90 days to go paid or face deletion some time ago when they first notified me. I have no intention of paying 4x what our paid message board costs per month to keep this forum running when it gets so little participation nowadays. The message board is worth it to have no trolls, extra perks like editing, private messaging, whole thread viewing, NO ADS, personal tags, signatures, and so many more perks. But the forum already has/had all of that. All we'd get for around $45 a month here is the ability to hide some of the individual boards, like this Back Alley. Since participation here is so minimal, I'm not inclined to save it by paying for it.
I've thought about copying the threads onto a different forum platform that doesn't charge, but just haven't gotten around to it yet so may run out of time before this all disappears. Who knows?
It's a shame because this forum platform is FAR superior to a simple message board. Not only does it allow for unlimited separate boards all in one forum, but it includes unlimited storage of threads and posts along with all of the afore-mentioned perks and individual settings for every member to make it appear as they want it to without affecting anyone else's views.
Anyway, my main point is that I'm not going to pay for this too on top of the message board cost AND I sympathize with you about dealing with Ken C. on his barely moderated boards. I always liked Ken, but gawd, he often made me angry & frustrated that he simply CANNOT understand nor see what the rest of us can so readily see... He is clearly on the spectrum and struggles with social cues and interactions that should be and ARE obvious to most everyone else.
You know what I'm talking about. Plus, he never comprehended WHY I was SO ANGRY at him for his endless requests for special considerations violating the basic rules here AND for betraying my confidence and trust when he didn't get his way regarding this board by thinkinghe had ANY right to make our disagreement public and especially putting it up for a VOTE on mongo's and R&E to try to embarrass me and/or "force" my hand to give him what he wanted when ALL he had to do was STOP READING THIS BOARD if he was that offended by greenman's comments or to confront him and give it back. Instead, he wanted me to create a special DNR for him when there are none and to censor greenman when this an anything goes board that explicitly says don't enter if you can't handle it. He STILL reads here on occasion!
While I do regret going ballistic on him for his betrayal because of his complete inability to think abstractly, metaphorically, theoretically, or to ever see hidden meanings behind words & actions rather than only his strictly concrete and literal understanding of the world because I know that it is not his fault nor choice, it is still maddenin and he deserved my anger.
I do not mean any personal offense to him for never growing beyond the concrete thinking of children because he cannot help that. However, I tried several times to open a dialogue about it to try to help him. Obviously, he didn't bite. I was too abstract about it because I didn’t want to offend him, just help him.
Having had an older brother on the spectrum whom I actually taught specific "lessons" to look out for so he'd recognize when words or actions were not to be taken literally so he'd ask for help from the other to understand their actual intent, I realize that it's not his fault. He's simply made that way and cannot change nor adjust for it without understanding that he needs specific help to learn how to navigate a world that is not concrete and is full of contradictions and abstract concepts.
After more than a year of trying to make him understand WHY I couldn't give him what he endlessly asked for, I lost my sh!t and went ballistic when he totally and completely betrayed me and threw me to the rabid dogs who totally enjoyed trashing me on both his and mongo's board.
Offline
Gawd, I guess I am still mad. Ugh.
Offline
There are other free platforms. I am happy to help you look
Offline
I have accounts on at least 5 others that I set up before choosing boardhost. I just didn't like them. However, I am not averse to help finding another one to build a new forum on.