Speaking of fake (climate) news..

SESticle showed up again with a derisive, dishonest pile of Climate Denier stink.

***
In case you missed it because of all the TDS-induced anti-Trump hysteria on here...[First, the announcement of his absolute Trumpster loyalties]

Posted by CE0802 on May 21, 2026, 5:24 am

Remember me saying that the Global Warmi.[Over and over, the same fake distinction between cause and effect]..uh, Climate Change models - that were being used by the alarmist lunatics to predict things like southern Florida being under water by last year - were total bullsh*t? [That statement is total BS, yes]

Remember when ignorant tools on here claimed that my opinion didn't matter because I had no background in predictive modeling? [Your opinion doesn't matter because you're a Trumptard]

Remember how I said that I had been doing predictive modeling for over 30 years? [calling you on that lie]

Well, it comes as no surprise that I was right and the ignorant tools on here were wrong.[Hot baloney]

The IPCC now admits that their most dire models - the ones used by Global Warmi...uh, Climate Change alarmists to predict the most extreme impacts - were total bullsh*t.[Another lie]

No wonder no one is talking about Climate Change anymore.[It's occurring, just like Trump fascism. No need to go over and over it, twit]

Unfortunately, the damage has been done. An entire generation was psychologically damaged by being told that the world was ending.[No one but you said that, moron]

https://www.aei.org/articles/rcp8-5-is-officially-dead/
***
American Enterprise Institute is of course, a right-wing 'think' tank.

Kenniboi is a increasingly a Trumper:

***
Is Gavin Newsom mostly dumb or is he mostly dishonest?

Posted by Ken C on May 24, 2026, 11:29 am

He could be both, but which is he more of? Is he mostly dumb?, or is he mostly dishonest?

Oil companies make about $0.20 per gallon profit from California gas.

California government gets about $0.71 per gallon profit from high gas taxes.

California's restrictive regulations also make gas even more expensive.

If Newsom was smart and honest, he could say something like "We need high gas taxes to save the environment and to fund our clean energy goals." Instead of that, he is blaming the oil companies for his bad gas policies.

https://joemessina.com/2026/04/california-taxes-more-per-gallon-outpaces-oil-company-profits/

https://totalnews.com/the-california-premium-understanding-why-the-states-take-per-gallon-consistently-exceeds-refiner-profits/
***
Ken a Trumpster? Is this why he kisses Mongo's butt?

When you drive your little electric car, why do you care so much about gas?

And why should the states not charge gasoline taxes?

Unfit to host any board.

Last edited by greenman (5/26/2026 11:41 am)

Trish wrote:

Yeah, his pro-maga stance has been becoming more prevalent

Another good reason to leave that failed experiment behind, frankly.

Also gotta love how DFM has taken over Yellow and made it the 'Jew Board.' He has literally half (15/30) of the posts there, all of which are pro-Judaism and pro-Israel, or anti-Muslim and/or anti-Arab.

What a disgusting bigot and defender of hatred, war and violence. And then on White Whine and Lavender Politics it's the same thing, with a big dose of Trump support thrown in.

DFM the Deplorable!

ps  - there are a couple that involve the meaning or history of Judaism which aren't bad.

Last edited by greenman (5/29/2026 10:20 am)

Lord Mongo is at his best when he's at his most intellectually pretentious. To wit:

***
That old Mondo, he never posts anything of substance.[Know thyself]>

Posted by Mondo Fuego™ on June 1, 2026, 5:23 am
On Atheism
by Mondo Fuego™

We have seen strong arguments for the existence of God ...[You and ...who else?]

Cosmological
Teleological
Moral
Ontological
[Do you know what 'Ontological' and 'Teleological' mean?)
Etc.

Beliefs, faith, mysticism, teachings, culture, tradition ... whatever to which one wishes to ascribe one's tenets [tortured English]. Yes, religion is hugely traditional. We [You] fbelieve because our ancestors believed. The religious world is full of churches, synagogues, temples, mosques ... lots of man hours and bricks and mortar devoted to the beliefs.

Yet, they are founded in the otherwise inexplicable phenomenon of creation ... everything we encounter is a creation ...[false] therefore someone or something must have created it ... right? Even the worn-out big bang theory [what theory has superseded it, please?] presupposes some kind of creative force. [Or at least you describe it as such] New astrophysical thinking is that the universe has always existed. God is thought to have always existed. [by WHOM?] One is the creator, the other is the created. Perhaps they are one and the same. Yay, one for Baruch! [Gibberish with no scientific meaning]

What is lacking in atheism is any logical inductive or deductive reasoning that leads to its conclusion. ['I do not believe God exists.' Refute me.]

I would like to see the line of reasoning that gets one to the point of atheism. Where is one's thinking before, and then when it starts? What triggers it? ['I don't see any evidence of a God. Refute me.] I don't buy the "leap of faith" argument ... there's no faith in atheism upon which to leap. [Only if you say 'I believe God does not exist.' That would involve faith.]"Leaping" also implies the point from which the leaping is done ... where is that point? Is it disillusionment? Is it anger at God for something they think He caused? [Who is 'angry' at something in which they do not believe?] That's emotional baggage, not rational thought. [More gibberish] An "Aha" moment? What was the "Aha"? ['Aha! Mongo is a pretentious imbecile!]

Atheism is to be likened to a perfect vacuum ... nothing there ... nothing to support it. [Nothing to refute it so far] It is also perhaps an illusion. One thinks that they do not believe, but they can never be quite sure because they can't put their finger on what or why they don't believe.[God.] The rational basis for total disbelief just ain't there. In some cases, atheism could just be a trendy rebellious movement, kind-a like anti-American sentiment among certain "progressive" cults, perhaps even ephemeral, subject to reversal when the next stimulus or trend is encountered.[I had a feeling it would come to your cultish, fake-Christian politics sooner or later, Trumpster]

Believers realize that they can't be quite sure, but they don't worry about it because the ultimate paydirt is to be made manifest at some point in the future, and they have the assurance of the now, and that the sun will rise tomorrow.[You have the assurance of simple-minded cultic belief. Congratulations, Sir Simpleton!]

I respectfully rest my case.

Counterpoints invited.
***

First, what 'case?'

Second, what am I arguing against?

Third, why the Trumpist politics?

You are a clown. There are uneducated people in the State Pen who argue better.

Last edited by greenman (6/01/2026 1:24 pm)