I do not have enough "four letter words" to describe my utter disgust at CS's response to this post (LAUGHING about it), URGGGGGGGGGGGGGG https://mb.boardhost.com/ReligionAndEthics/msg/1753810267.html
 

Trish wrote:

I do not have enough "four letter words" to describe my utter disgust at CS's response to this post (LAUGHING about it), URGGGGGGGGGGGGGG https://mb.boardhost.com/ReligionAndEthics/msg/1753810267.html
 

CS?? Those are not Deanna's RL initials so I'm confused what they stand for?

DeeDee is a dimwitted, demented, giggle box. Don't expect anything resembling intelligent, critical thinking from her.

EVEN FUNNIER !!!  mongo is the personification of a sock puppet runner!  LOL

It would be one thing to give you grief about using Cheezit this week after farkle last week. However, actually claiming that he doesn't use fake name sockpuppets when he so obviously does now and always did, perhaps the first in the board groups we all came from, is blantly FALSE and beyond hypocritical !!

I don't know why you still bother posting there with the AHs who dominate it and Ken's obvoous bias, but whatever your reason is, at least you don't LIE about it when "busted".

They make it miserable there that it's no wonder posters use sockpuppets in spite of it always being incredibly obvious who each one is within a post or two.

Wouldn't it be better if ALL posters were anonymous so whatever is posted had some chance of being read before the knives come out on sight with regular names?

I suppose... but don't HH, Lucky, and Capone/Gustavo already do that on a daily basis?

It's not like any of them actually care or listen to what anyone else says about their sh*tt*ness or anyone reading doesn't already know how pathetic and terrible they all are.

Once again, mongo attempts to control Ken's board as he trashes it and several of its posters. Ken actually responded defensively rather than telling mongo where to go! 

https://mb.boardhost.com/Bi-PartisanPolitics/msg/1753901349.html


R&E Political Discussion 2025 ]   

• This board is an experiment gone wrong. No discussion. Just rancor.

  Posted by Mondo Fuego™ on July 30, 2025, 11:49 am

 Were it mine, I would have closed it long ago.

Political chat boards always seem to degenerate to the lowest common denominator. Here it is Just the facts, a life-long, habitual stalker/troll. Never a substantive post.

It is over-run by derelict trolls who have nothing going on in their lives. They sit at their chiclet keyboards day in and day out stalking other posters and taking idiotic pot-shots at them. Never an intelligent post.

Here's the usual vagrants:

JTF, just the facts, a/k/a Heavy Hemi, HH, ATK, Art the King - he has been at it, stalking posters and attaching them for almost 3 decades, banned everywhere. misogynist, extremely rude to female posters

John Capone, a ne'er do well who changed his handle recently

cheezit, a nasty troll who changed his handle recently, probably greenman

Lucky, a rabid Trump-hater who has disappeared lately after Trump's major success and record market highs. He has nothing left to criticize.

Mugwump, a dark, brooding Iago-type who occasionally crawls out from under a wet rock to spew venom

KR, a nihilist whose world has nothing right in it; claims to be smarter than most, but has yet to prove it.

Gustavo, a/k/a Mike S, goes by many aliases, vulgar misogynist, banned everywhere, in time-out here

Other drive-by sock puppets: flarkle/farkle, Pony

He has a fascistic nature; that's why he adores Trump. He IS Trump, in many ways.

Obviously, IF Ken wanted to make the board work better, the FIRST thing he'd do would be to permanently ban Mongo.

Too bad he lacks the courage..

Punk Kenniboi couldn't resist announcing that I'd posted under different names (not at the same time) on Political.

He also made the announcement about a Rightie so he could pretend to be 'fair.'

I called him out on it.  Let's see if he breaks his 'no permanent bans' rule next.

What a scumbag..

Don't be stupid.

Of course it was an 'attack on me personally.'

Just can't stop defending him, can you? lol

Pathetic.

greenman wrote:

Don't be stupid.

Of course it was an 'attack on me personally.'

Just can't stop defending him, can you? lol

Pathetic.

-----

So now you're attacking ME for offering my considered opinion based on extensive observation?

I'm most certainly NOT defending Ken. THAT is what is "stupid".

greenman wrote:

I will answer this stupid piece of bullshit, though:

"Besides, why do you take any of this so damned seriously? Why do you even care? You claim to dislike that board. You can't stand Ken. You can't stand any of the regulars.

It seems that you just like to go after particular posters whom you dislike rather than actually wanting bipartisan discussion."

**

Firstly, dummy, you know there's no 'bipartisan discussion' going on. Why do you make that an issue -and blame it on me - when you know it's bullshit? Huh? You sound stupid when you do that.

I've explained 'why I care' many times, but you're so self-obsessed you apparently don't pay attention. Because I think that REAL DISCUSSION is worthwhile. 

I'm fine if it's rough-and-tumble, fine if it's angry at times, fine if it's somewhat profane. What I hate are asshats like Mongo who DELIBERATELY SABOTAGE it. And enablers like Kenniboi who make that possible.

Why you keep defending that worthless p*ssy POS, and implicitly enabling trash like Mongo, I dunno.

Stay away from the goddamn board if you don't like it. And don't EVER lecture me about what I should do again.

greenman/cheezit/habeas and so forth

-------

I'll wait for your very much owed apology for such obvious BS and angry striking out at me along with calling me a dummy and stupid!

WHERE did I defend either mongo OR Ken??  WHERE did I "lecture" you or try to boss you around??? 

NOWHERE!

I NEVER suggested there is ANY bipartisan discussion there. It is nothing BUT a hate-filled slug-fest. NEVER did I blame that on you! RIF

It will NEVER be a place for bipartisan discussion there because its members will not ever allow it to be. Most love the ugly attacks too much to ever stop. That is abundantly OBVIOUS!

In the meantime, leave me the f*ck alone.

If you don't want responses or any disagreement with your opinions, consider not posting stuff where responses are expected.

The self-obsessed and self-centered one here is NOT ME. Lemme know when you figure it out.

You think that I boss people around?

WHO and WHERE did/do I boss you or anyone else around??

The one who is NEVER WRONG is actually you. Nothing is ever your fault. It is someone else's OR they MADE you do it with their actions.

Are you suggesting that my offering an opinion that is not precisely the same as yours makes me stupid, a dummy, and somehow against you and on the side of those I totally disagree with?

You think that I am an egomaniac and in the SAME group as those you despise?

Seriously?

Well, tell me how you really feel about me... Oh wait, you just did!

This is a really bad thing and quite hurtful. I thought that we were friends who had mutual respect for each other.

Clearly, I was wrong.

Siagiah wrote:

You think that I boss people around?

WHO and WHERE did/do I boss you or anyone else around??

The one who is NEVER WRONG is actually you. Nothing is ever your fault. It is someone else's OR they MADE you do it with their actions.

Are you suggesting that my offering an opinion that is not precisely the same as yours makes me stupid, a dummy, and somehow against you and on the side of those I totally disagree with?

You think that I am an egomaniac and in the SAME group as those you despise?

Seriously?

Well, tell me how you really feel about me... Oh wait, you just did!

This is a really bad thing and quite hurtful. I thought that we were friends who had mutual respect for each other.

Clearly, I was wrong.

False. I've apologized MANY TIMES on here and other boards for things I thought were over the top. felt bad about, or were factually wrong. And even just to placate people who were upset.

You almost NEVER do.  And bossy?

Don't get me started....lol

Your first sentence is hilarious. You literally do that ALL THE TIME.

I guess you don't see it that way?  Or care about the feelings of others, or something?

I dunno. I don't care.

greenman wrote:

Your first sentence is hilarious. You literally do that ALL THE TIME.

I guess you don't see it that way?  Or care about the feelings of others, or something?

I dunno. I don't care.

------

You think I "fly off the handle" literally all the time??? When? Where? Please be specific because NO I do not see things that way. I rarely lose my temper and/or fly off the handle.

You think I don't care about the feelings of others?? Literally, that is the opposite of what anyone who knows me would EVER say. They'd say that I care TOO much about other people's feelings so I "pull my punches" too much to spare feelings whenever I feel that I have to address a sticky situation. NO, I am not joking!