With the exception of "The Back Alley", CIVIL DISCUSSION IS EXPECTED.
Online!
This post by greenman is disappointing. I'm about to delete it. I just wanted to post this showing why I thought the post should be deleted.
Also I don't like to criticize people without giving them a chance to reply and give their side of the argument. That's why I avoid using this forum to criticize people who don't post here.
Last edited by Ken C (10/13/2023 4:25 pm)
Offline
Now she’s back posting politocally-based BS. Look at this disingenuous twaddle! No wonder she DNRd me, because I’d have called her on it..
***
Question
Posted by observer on October 13, 2023, 12:27 pm
In view of all the unrest in the world today, I’m wondering if it is legal for foreigners to lead protests in our country. I am NOT suggesting that it is happening. I just wonder what the legal
reality is.
***
‘I’m NOT suggesting that it is happening…’
Yes you are.
Offline
greenman wrote:
I don’t believe he did. It was pretty clearly a request by whiny observer, who doesn’t
take criticism well.
Observer is blind about religion. She has an entire lumber company in her eyes. All she sees is her own. very narrow view. She is rational, reasonable, pleasant and intelligent until she discusses religion.
Offline
Well, she DNR'd me too. I have NO CLUE WHY though. I've never done ANYTHING to her aside of disagreeing.
SHE is an extremely arrogant, self-absorbed person who cannot STAND it if someone gets the best of her in a disagreement. I wasn't nasty to her, I simply challenged the bitch. (that's what I think of her now). There is absolutely NO REASON for her asking for a DNR against me.
I've NEVER mistreated her before, only challenged her and given back a little the stinky snark that she constantly dishes out to me. She constantly insulted me with her holier-than-though, phony Christian commentary. Yet, I never DNR'd her in spite of her being the most arrogant, pathetic excuse for a Christian that I've ever encountered.
I've even stuck up for her multiple times when Mike Scalese and KR have been unnecessarily nasty to her. I'll never do that again. In fact, I may apologize to both of them for it. She CLEARLY deserves the CRAP she gets from them.
I didn't consider her an enemy before... NOW I DO.
Offline
Ken C wrote:
This post by greenman is disappointing. I'm about to delete it. I just wanted to post this showing why I thought the post should be deleted.
Also I don't like to criticize people without giving them a chance to reply and give their side of the argument. That's why I avoid using this forum to criticize people who don't post here.
- ..you fake Christian SOB. Posted by greenman on October 13, 2023, 12:10 pm, in reply to "Crybto someone who cares," Go back to the White board and kiss the boss’s ass there.Message Thread
- I protest the existence of DNR. - greenman October 13, 2023, 10:37 am
- Want some cheese with that whine? - BornToFarm October 13, 2023, 12:04 pm
- Crybto someone who cares, - greenman October 13, 2023, 12:09 pm
- ..you fake Christian SOB. - greenman October 13, 2023, 12:10 pm
=====================================
Sure, greenman went a bit overboard with his response, but c'mon, borntofarm was begging for a negative response to his remarks to greenman. It wasn't nice of him either and he DELIBERATELY PROVOKED greenman, knowing exactly what kind of response he'd get. Then he played the victim card, his usual M.O.
Offline
I’ll admit I don’t like Born to Farm, a phony who attacked me personally when I said NOTHING to him, simply expressed my view (not profane) of DNR.
Are personal attacks legal, Ken, and left up if you disapprove of the reply?
Sorry about the ‘SOB,’ but you need to pay some attention to your other posters’ behavior.
Offline
Siagiah wrote:
Well, she DNR'd me too. I have NO CLUE WHY though. I've never done ANYTHING to her aside of disagreeing.
SHE is an extremely arrogant, self-absorbed person who cannot STAND it if someone gets the best of her in a disagreement. I wasn't nasty to her, I simply challenged the bitch. (that's what I think of her now). There is absolutely NO REASON for her asking for a DNR against me.
I've NEVER mistreated her before, only challenged her and given back the stinky snark that she constantly dishes out to me. She constantly insulted me with her holier-than-though, phony Christian commentary. Yet, I never DNR'd her in spite of her being the most arrogant, pathetic excuse for a Christian that I've ever encountered.
I've even stuck up for her multiple times when Mike Scalese and KR have been unnecessarily nasty to her. I'll never do that again. In fact, I may apologize to both of them for it. She CLEARLY deserves the CRAP she gets from them.
I didn't consider her an enemy before... NOW I DO.
FTR, when she first arrived, she was different than now. She declined and deteriorated. I am uncertain whether her religious views poisoned her mind, or perhaps a poisoned mind warped her religious views. Don't care. Not sure what's going on there, but it's a matter for her psychoanalyst who is neither you or me. It's a very short walk from religious fanaticism to insanity. Bauer is a poster child, and sadly Observer is moving that way. Maybe they can get a room.
Offline
Shadow/Sophia/Observer is one of the long time posters there. She is like she's always been from way back. I think you've forgotten how terrible she was to you before changing her name.
Offline
Siagiah wrote:
Shadow/Sophia/Observer is one of the long time posters there. She is like she's always been from way back. I think you've forgotten how terrible she was to you before changing her name.
No, I did not forget. But when she had the falling out with CPD, she softened a lot, and we had a reconciliation and period of illuminative common interest discussions. But lately, she sank back into that pit, and I expect her to DNR me at some point too. IMO the DNR applies to people who stalk and target. Use of it to prevent discussion with somebody who simply disagrees with you is abusive, and that's where she is now.
Offline
Yep, that's precisely where she is. Her venom, barely disguised behind her southern style syrup way of saying it, is every bit as bad as what she objects to being said to or about her, if not worse because she DELIGHTS in the idea of those who disagree spending eternity in hell.
She is as PHONY as it gets and a crappy representative of her religious beliefs.
She clearly thinks she is special and can say or do whatever she pleases without ramifications. She claims that those who disagree speak for her favorite foil, satan, while she supposedly speaks for her god. Pity the gods that be that SHE forcefully tries to represent them regardless of how OPPOSITE her behavior is.
Anyone who doesn't reflect her personal belief system and too high opinion of herself she treats as beneath contempt. She is more focused on what she sees as polite-ish speech being SO IMPORTANT than on its content, so dismisses anything NOT "polite" so she need never see herself as the rest of us see her.
She is an ancient crone with ancient ideas and a prima dona attitude she thinks she is entitled to.
If there is a God, pity her reaction when SHE is rejected as doing the devil's work
And turning off potential believers with her gawd-awful pretentiousness!
Offline
She’s over there right now pushing the Trump line on Hamas and Israel. If course to her it’s about the fictional ‘End Times,’ so it’s all about getting Jesus back..
Offline
greenman wrote:
She’s over there right now pushing the Trump line on Hamas and Israel. If course to her it’s about the fictional ‘End Times,’ so it’s all about getting Jesus back..
===========
Jesus would take ONE LOOK at what passes for his flock and he'd turn back and close heaven's gates.
Offline
I don’t doubt it. Or as Kris Kristofferson sang:
‘Jesus was a Capricorn, he ate organic foods
He believed in love and peace and never wore no shoes
Long hair, beard and sandles and a funky bunch of friends
Reckon they'd just nail him up, if he come down again..’
Offline
Sad but true
Online!
Here is another example of an abusive post by greenman:
Online!
More abuse:
Offline
Ken, are you excusing what triggered it??
Gustav/Mike Scalese attacked Mugwump as MugWIMP. Greenman didn't say ANYTHING worse than that, so why isn't what Mike/Gustav said being called abusive?
Offline
Muggywumper knows
Posted by Gustavo on October 16, 2023, 1:05 pm, in reply to "We already know the Old Testament exists"
Online!
Siagiah wrote:
Ken, are you excusing what triggered it??
Gustav/Mike Scalese attacked Mugwump as MugWIMP. Greenman didn't say ANYTHING worse than that, so why isn't what Mike/Gustav said being called abusive?
I removed that post. I wish I had seen it sooner. I wish someone had emailed me about it. That's unacceptable and degrades the whole forum.
The name was misspelled by only one letter, I wear glasses. Sorry I did not notice it sooner.
My email address is right at the top of the forum. Sometimes instead of emailing me to report abuse, people just post about it here. That's one of the reasons I check this forum. Checking this forum every day is much quicker than reading every post on R&E.
Online!
Criticizing people who wear glasses is just as bad as criticizing other people who have other handicaps.
I always try to be fair, polite and honest. Once again I am the only member of this forum who is being attacked and criticized here. I need a break. Good bye.
Offline
.
.
and how about this?
You certainly would be gone too Posted by Gustavo on October 16, 2023, 3:44 pm, in reply to "If it was your board, it would be EMPTY"
greenman and Sia aka sh*t and stink.
Offline
Ken C wrote:
Criticizing people who wear glasses is just as bad as criticizing other people who have other handicaps.
I always try to be fair, polite and honest. Once again I am the only member of this forum who is being attacked and criticized here. I need a break. Good bye.
===========================================
I'm not attacking you. It was just easier to copy and paste here than to send it all via email and I knew you were looking in.
I wear glasses too. I certainly WASN'T attacking you for wearing them. I'm confused why you thought that??
Offline
.
.
The truth is
Posted by Gustavo on October 16, 2023, 3:33 pm, in reply to "Why don't you give him the month off? Don't read or respond to him for a month."
greenman has been nothing but a wise ass punk since he returned.
greenman is nothing more than a troublemaker agitator. If this was my board he would be long gone.
Offline
.
.
.
Crybaby
Posted by Gustavo on October 16, 2023, 3:58 pm, in reply to "Reported Abuse (as well as several others)"
You just like to dish your abuse out. No good when it comes back.
Offline
.
.
greenman take the rest of the month off
Posted by Gustavo on October 16, 2023, 3:00 pm, in reply to "Cowardice."
It won’t happen because you are one of the clique who is protected by Ken and Trish.
Offline
Never mind. I’m done with that damfool board.
The drama, insults, poor moderation and abusive behavior by ‘favorites’ is childish and pathetic.
I’m done after asking a simple question and getting p!ssed on by Scalise with no posts being taken down.
***
Are rules about politics made up at random? - greenman October 16, 2023, 2:51 pm
If I may, referring to American failure to prevent 9/11 is very general - Sia October 16, 2023, 3:34 pm
I don't have time to list every word or sentence that is or is not allowed. - Ken C (Admin) October 16, 2023, 3:16 pm
Pathetic. - greenman October 16, 2023, 4:41 pm
greenman should get the rest of the month off - Gustavo October 16, 2023, 3:26 pm
For asking a question? - greenman October 16, 2023, 4:29 pm
Why don't you give him the month off? Don't read or respond to him for a month. - Pikes Peak 14115 October 16, 2023, 3:29 pm
The truth is - Gustavo October 16, 2023, 3:33 pm
Is THIS post OK, Ken? - greenman October 16, 2023, 4:31 pm
You like to deny the truth - Gustavo October 16, 2023, 4:32 pm
Hey, Scleezy - greenman October 16, 2023, 4:42 pm
If it was your board, it would be EMPTY - Sia October 16, 2023, 3:37 pm
You certainly would be gone too - Gustavo October 16, 2023, 3:44 pm
Reported Abuse (as well as several others) - Sia October 16, 2023, 3:57 pm
Crybaby - Gustavo October 16, 2023, 3:58 pm
Ha ha ha... You are quite mistaken - Sia October 16, 2023, 4:01 pm
In other words you are a rat - Gustavo October 16, 2023, 4:04 pm
The nasty one here is you. - greenman October 16, 2023, 4:32 pm
Why don’t you cut out your nonsense - Gustavo October 16, 2023, 4:34 pm
Make me, little boy. - greenman October 16, 2023, 4:40 pm
Frankly, so should you. - Sia October 16, 2023, 3:27 pm
***
I’ll stick to Blue. Who needs that crap? Sorry I ever went back.
Offline
More Scalese/Gustavo crap....
First, what he responded to:
Ha ha ha... You are quite mistaken
Posted by Sia on October 16, 2023, 4:01 pm, in reply to "Crybaby"
NOTHING you say bothers me in the least personally.
However, when you behave terribly and violate the rules here, I always report it because that's what good citizens of a board SHOULD do.
You DEGRADE this and every other forum with your abusive nonsense.
===============================
In other words you are a rat
Posted by Gustavo on October 16, 2023, 4:04 pm, in reply to "Ha ha ha... You are quite mistaken"
a creep who loves to dish out her nasty insults but cannot take it when it comes back.
Poor thing, what a shame huh….
===================================================
Gustavo/Scalese projects his OWN nastiness onto others. NOTHING I said to him was nasty.
Offline
Ken works a full time, stressful job. Last thing he wants to do on his own time is massive clean ups on aisles 1-32. Attacking or criticizing him on his board for rule enforcement is never a good idea. His email is atop the forum, and complaints should be sent there. That is his office. He is reasonable and dependable with response. Be patient. Let people like Scalese hang themselves with their own ropes, and be careful you're not accidentally caught in some coils when the body drops.
Last edited by Pikes Peak 14115 (10/17/2023 1:41 am)
Offline
I just find the whole tenor of the board unpleasant. I think this is what Dancing Digits was saying when she left, although she’s been giving it another try since the Three Reprobates got times-out (well deserved, and Scalise needs to join them).
But there’s just a lot of hostility, name-calling, and attacking going on there and while I have participated at times, I’ve let a lot of things go, too - believe me. I have tried to be reasonable, to criticize rather than insult (unless insulted).
I remember the board back in the day, and it was NEVER like that . And as I’m not adding anything much to it, why bother. Leaving my options open, but it’s been a big disappointment.
Offline
Pikes Peak 14115 wrote:
Ken works a full time, stressful job. Last thing he wants to do on his own time is massive clean ups on aisles 1-32. Attacking or criticizing him on his board for rule enforcement is never a good idea. His email is atop the forum, and complaints should be sent there. That is his office. He is reasonable and dependable with response. Be patient. Let people like Scalese hang themselves with their own ropes, and be careful you're not accidentally caught in some coils when the body drops.
=====================================
I did send them there. I was only pointing out that greenman is most certainly NOT the only one being unpleasant, Gustav was triggering most of it with HIS posts, that Ken hadn't noticed. It didn't seem at all fair for greenman's questionable posts to be here without Gustav's along with them. At the same time, I DID send them all to Ken directly in case he missed them here.
Apparently, he did miss many because several are still there on R&E.
I was NOT knocking him, just pointing out that there is more to the story. I'm also confused why he thinks that HE is the only member being "criticized" here. He was criticizing greenman too.