Well, thanks, I guess.  History repeats itself, and I’m stuck with a DNR whether I want one or not.

Oh well.  It’s not like I’ll miss talking to the idiot.

If he was asking for one, that’s his business -  and a matter for Ken to decide.  Seems odd that a guy who was CONSTANTLY, almost obsessively posting to everything I put on the board would ask for a DNR; but then he doesn’t like to have his little conspiracy lectures derided or interrupted.  Luckily there are plenty of others willing to do that!

The only thing that annoyed me is that I was in effect blamed equally with him, and that’s absurdly unfair.  But that’s in the nature of DNRs.

Last edited by greenman (8/23/2023 11:29 am)

Here’s an example of what I was saying about being singled out:

***
My parents are older then you and they keep up with technology.

Posted by KR on August 22, 2023, 6:37 pm, in reply to "This technology is a challenge. I’m slow. I had 23 trackers stopped just last week. Probably from"

You must just be slow and stupid…..or just an ignorant looooooony!

Now GFY
***
Is profanity against the rules, or only when I use it?

Just wondering..

There is something wrong with the forum search feature.  Sometimes I search for a word like "GFY", and the search feature does not show posts that contain the word.

Also both GOG and greenman don't email me to report problems.  Instead of emailing me, they post things like this:

greenman wrote:

Here’s an example of what I was saying about being singled out:

***
My parents are older then you and they keep up with technology.

Posted by KR on August 22, 2023, 6:37 pm, in reply to "This technology is a challenge. I’m slow. I had 23 trackers stopped just last week. Probably from"

You must just be slow and stupid…..or just an ignorant looooooony!

Now GFY
***
Is profanity against the rules, or only when I use it?

Just wondering..

Ken C wrote:

There is something wrong with the forum search feature.  Sometimes I search for a word like "GFY", and the search feature does not show posts that contain the word.

Also both GOG and greenman don't email me to report problems.  Instead of emailing me, they post things like this:

greenman wrote:

Here’s an example of what I was saying about being singled out:

***
My parents are older then you and they keep up with technology.

Posted by KR on August 22, 2023, 6:37 pm, in reply to "This technology is a challenge. I’m slow. I had 23 trackers stopped just last week. Probably from"

You must just be slow and stupid…..or just an ignorant looooooony!

Now GFY
***
Is profanity against the rules, or only when I use it?

Just wondering..

 

Also: can you answer my question, Ken. Is profanity only a problem if I do it, or do the same rules apply to others?

Thanks.

Siagiah wrote:

Which is why LINKS as just as important as the text when sending in a report.  I always include both so that Ken or Trish can read what's inside of the link to decide while reading the email if it warrants deletion, editing, or warnings.  That saves them time since they have so little of it.

I also include links to the questionable post, and refrain from frequent "report" knowing Ken and Trish have limited time. The board is their R&R, not their thankless, unpaid job.

The fact is GOG is running out of people who will converse with him. Greenman, he did with you exactly what he does with everyone driven to seek a DNR for relief.  He also refuses to follow the directions and email concerns with Ken and Trish. They showed extraordinary patience and tolerance in dealing with him. If they choose the path of registration, that will be a last ditch effort to control what defies control. No doubt criticisms will show up in the places and from those who have problems with registration, because it stopt their abuse and trolling in its tracks. They have only themselves to blame for registration of this site, and if R&E follows that practice, GOG will be one of the main trolls responsible for that movement. 
 

greenman wrote:

I’ve actually e-mailed you several times, Ken. The problem is you almost never ANSWER me.

Don’t try to evade responsibility for the failures of moderation you’re so famous for.

Most of your emails did not have links.  It was hard for me to know what specific post you were complaining about.

Ken C wrote:

greenman wrote:

I’ve actually e-mailed you several times, Ken. The problem is you almost never ANSWER me.

Don’t try to evade responsibility for the failures of moderation you’re so famous for.

Most of your emails did not have links.  It was hard for me to know what specific post you were complaining about.

Sorry. Will try to be more careful if necessary (hopefully it won’t be).

Fair play!  Although I would think tolerating you is a low bar.  Tolerating me is more of a test…;)

Last edited by greenman (8/24/2023 12:24 pm)

Funny stuff!  No doubt it got mongo's attention and he spouted off.  He'll do anything to get our attention... As if we care

 

I thought COVID disinformation was a no-no, but idiot boy continues to post that stuff…?

A DNR violation against you too where he agreed with SES's diss of you.

https://mb.boardhost.com/ReligionAndEthics/msg/1693060159.html
 

I sent both in as DNR violations before seeing your original post about his DNR violation against Mugwump here,

If they aren't reported, he'll just get worse about his violations and push the edges further.
 

This was a direct reference to a post of mine to someone else, too. Not enough complain about, really, but typical.

***
380 might be more reasonable a figure. 2,000 school kids

Posted by GOG on August 27, 2023, 7:10 am, in reply to "Re: And some think it’s only 115 dead bodies after this much time passed???!!"

are still missing. But hey, speculation might upset the public order. Truth is the first victim…..
***

He does that stuff all the time, as you know..