With the exception of "The Back Alley", CIVIL DISCUSSION IS EXPECTED.
Offline
This goes to the top of my OMG I CAN'T BELIEVE GOG POSTED IT list...
DRIP DROP is the "news guy" ??? OMG... Just unbelievable!
I have followed this case. No the “best evidence” should not be demolished
Posted by GOG on July 8, 2023, 12:21 pm, in reply to "Re: Should a Notorious Crime Scene Be Demolished Before Trial?"
until AFTER the trial’s conclusion. Jurors find it helpful to be physically in the murder venue to grasp a more 3D understanding. If you really want to blow your woke mind, go to Crime Circus. Not Crime Circus Cult. There your host Drip Drop has two of his latest updated investigations. He makes startling discoveries that generate one BOOM after another. Brian Kohberger might well be innocent. There are two other characters with a psychological profile bordering on psychopath. . There also are too many coincidences for me not think there is an underlying dynamic involving sex trafficking and drug dealing. Some very sinister going on. Watch the second vid from top on Kohberger first. Then go to the latest abovevthat. Tgat firms a foundation. Don’t let Drip Drop’s attire put you off. This is Indy Media not CNN. Enjoy.
Offline
Gog has become worse and worse lately trying to couch insults and other violations inside his post. He is disgusting
Offline
Trish wrote:
Gog has become worse and worse lately trying to couch insults and other violations inside his post. He is disgusting
He’s rather comically ‘outraged’ that his posts are being taken down. What a joke.
Offline
Dreading seeing how frequently he violates the DNR that Ken is putting in place tomorrow morning. No doubt it will be fairly often. As he himself noted, he's addicted to responding to me with his B.S.
Offline
Well, it took GOG all of 6 hours to violate the DNR I took out against him, that he somehow thinks that Ken granted HIM. What a dimwitted putz!
Offline
Now he's boasting that the DNR is a result of HIS request which, of course, is not possible since he never emails ADMIN. Pathetic.
Offline
Yep. Comical desire for approval from his Master, Dr. Mongostein (or should it be ‘Dr. Fuegenstein?’):
***
Civilized Personal Discussion
[ Post a Message ]
Yay, finally a DNR on Sia. - GOG July 10, 2023, 9:38 pm
Good job. - Mondo Fuego™ July 10, 2023, 10:49 pm
She is trying to claim credit. But I asked first. - GOG July 10, 2023, 11:40 pm
Yes, and I’m one. She is trying to take credit for the issuance of - GAoG July 10, 2023, 11:38 pm
***
‘Good job, iGOG!’ lol
Last edited by greenman (7/11/2023 9:24 am)
Offline
Did GOG ask for the DNR by a process?
He said his email doesn't work, so what process?
Did he do it by just "thinking" about it?
Is DNR material his property?
Does he have a right to take it?
Project much?
Offline
Trish wrote:
Now he's boasting that the DNR is a result of HIS request which, of course, is not possible since he never emails ADMIN. Pathetic.
============================================
Besides the fact that I pre-requested it on June 28th and decided to hold off a bit just to see what happened if he'd stop the nonsense. He didn't.
If he asked for a DNR on the board, which I presume he did, not only does it not count, but it looked like he requested it against THREE of us (me, greenman, and KR). Yet only the request I made via email was installed.
It's a sad day when a DNR becomes necessary, so WHY is the freak celebrating? He's an idiot.
Offline
Pikes Peak 14115 wrote:
Did GOG ask for the DNR by a process?
He said his email doesn't work, so what process?
Did he do it by just "thinking" about it?
Is DNR material his property?
Does he have a right to take it?
Project much?
================================================
From other posts, I think that he may have spewed up an idiotic post that demanded a DNR against me, greenman, and KR that one of the admins deleted. But I never saw it. THAT is NOT how it's done and he damned well knows it.
WHO cares if his phone and email are "screwed up" ? He's so ignorant that he can't either fix it or take it to be fixed? What a maroon.
Offline
greenman wrote:
Yep. Comical desire for approval from his Master, Dr. Mongostein (or should it be ‘Dr. Fuegenstein?’):
***
Civilized Personal Discussion
[ Post a Message ]
Yay, finally a DNR on Sia. - GOG July 10, 2023, 9:38 pm
Good job. - Mondo Fuego™ July 10, 2023, 10:49 pm
She is trying to claim credit. But I asked first. - GOG July 10, 2023, 11:40 pm
Yes, and I’m one. She is trying to take credit for the issuance of - GAoG July 10, 2023, 11:38 pm
***
‘Good job, iGOG!’ lol
=============================================
HOW pathetic is THAT? Next, mongo will claim that HE took out the DNR against me when that's the opposite of the truth. Just like his claim that he banned me when I left of my own accord and banned HIM from Blue for his gross misbehavior.
The two of them DESERVE each other!
Apparently, mongo LOVES the conflicts, else he'd not have responded to the worm and would have deleted it.
But noooooooo, he didn't. He encouraged more and attacked ME first. Pathetic!
Offline
Pikes Peak 14115 wrote:
Did GOG ask for the DNR by a process?
He said his email doesn't work, so what process?
Did he do it by just "thinking" about it?
Is DNR material his property?
Does he have a right to take it?
Project much?
Pikes I think he put on his magical aluminum hat and THOUGHT the dnr to ken....
Offline
Somehow, he doesn't realize that Ken never saw his "illegal" post. You took it down. So, it's obvious that Ken did NOT grant him "his request", but mine. Not that it REALLY matters. The important thing is that he is now DNR'd and it's done! He cannot flood my posts with his idiocy any more.
Offline
Trish wrote:
Pikes Peak 14115 wrote:
Did GOG ask for the DNR by a process?
He said his email doesn't work, so what process?
Did he do it by just "thinking" about it?
Is DNR material his property?
Does he have a right to take it?
Project much?
Pikes I think he put on his magical aluminum hat and THOUGHT the dnr to ken....
I was driving to something like that.
I had to request DNR against GOG, jb, and Deanna for their incessant abuse,
repeating the same old ad nauseum.
I re-enacted the DNR against Mondo for the unceasing, incessant attacks on other
people I call and think of as friends. I could no longer stand by and ignore that. I asked
for it to end many times too. Mondo has some really fine qualities. But they're buried
under some apparent need to pursue people he feels somehow wronged him. He
apparently thought that was more important to maintain, than to grow a new friendship.
Who loses? We both lost.
Last edited by Pikes Peak 14115 (7/11/2023 5:26 pm)
Offline
HOLY FLIPPIN' CRAPPOLI!!
Did anyone see this post by GOG in the addiction thread on R&E??
Good. America as a whole could use the strong discipline of tough love.
Posted by GOG on July 12, 2023, 4:27 pm, in reply to "but for some hard decision on my part"
We love you. But hate the sinner.
Offline
GOG has now violated my DNR against him 4 times in just 2 days! I hope that Ken gives him a time out. He more than deserves it!
jb will now be DNR'd for his repeated attacks on me calling me an anti-Semite. I don't know why he's calling both me and greenman that, but it's unacceptable and won't be let go. I've put up with more than enough of his CRAP since I dropped my DNR against him last year. It's over now!
Offline
They’re utterly worthless posters, neither one completely compos mentis.
Both are jerks and whiners as well.
Offline
So we gonna start a game of DNR bingo?
Offline
I hate having to get DNRs and wait until I'm totally fed up before asking for one.
Offline
Here’s some comic relief:
***
Oh, look at me ... me ... me. Ain't I sumpin? What's your "process"?
Posted by Mondo Fuego™ on July 14, 2023, 3:46 pm
Wordle 755 2/6
⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"OH, he doesn't know how to play Wordle."
Heh heh heh!
***
Oh wow, he had one good game! lol
Offline
LOL How pathetic IS his need for attention?? You'd think that he misses us so much that he MUST make a fuss so someone might notice?
He probably copied one of our games to get it in two since he did it AFTER all the answers were posted. LOL
Offline
GOG’s over there whining about being banned on R&E. News to me, but he deserves it - between multiple DNR violations (which he pretends were ‘accidental’), constant spamming, abusive comments and outright racism or anti-Semitism, it was inevitable.
Will it be his fault? No! It’s a ‘conspiracy…’ lol
Offline
Apparently he used a fake name to post that supposedly violated my DNR against him.. Ken saw it and banned the ip of whomever it was. It must have been GOG. I know because I asked him
LOOKS LIKE IT WAS WELL DESERVED
Offline
If it was, it certainly didn't last long. GOG's been posting almost all day.
Offline
GOG is the one who said he was banned. Ken didn't. After seeing Greenman's post that GOG was banned, I asked Ken if he'd banned GOG because of the 4+ DNR violations, but he said that he banned whomever's IP posted the B.S. claim that I violated my DNR with GOG, which I absolutely didn't. He didn't know who it was though.
Most likely, GOG did another of his CRAP CLAIMS without establishing the facts.
Offline
He's claiming he's banned again and accused Trish (who, unless things changed recently, doesn't have that access level). Given his tenuous grasp on reality, who knows if he's actually banned.
Whatever. The mad scramble to enable the twin trolls will undoubtedly continue apace.
Offline
BTW Poppet, you're correct that only an admin can ban someone and the software doesn't allow for more than one admin so it's not possible that Trish banned someone.
Only if Ken shared HIS log in could she do that, which I totally doubt he'd EVER do.
Offline
GOG used to accuse me of banning him way back when he'd post on Blue when I hadn't. I think that his internet service is sometimes very sketchy and that's what happens when he claims he's banned but the admin apparently hadn't.
Offline
This morning's post should clear things up
Offline
Thanks, Trish! I noticed in your post that your "red letter" notice calls you "administrator grasshopper," so I may have been mistaken about your access level, but as far as I know Ken still reserves the right to issue a ban to himself.
Also: in the "credit where credit's due" department, GOG took note of the clarification and issued an apology, both on R&E and on the White Board.